logo Standing Up To Powerful Interests

Public Health & Prescription Drugs In the News

SearchRSS Feed

The Charlotte Observer - 01/09/2007

The Public Should Know Hospital Infection Rates

By Karen Garloch

Infections acquired in hospitals cause a lot of added pain and expense for patients. But in the Carolinas, and in most other states, it's impossible to find out if the hospital you're entering has an abnormal infection rate.

Pennsylvania -- thanks to a 20-year effort by a coalition of business and labor leaders tired of paying more for health care of unknown quality -- was the first state to require hospitals to report infection rates and make them public.

It is one of only 14 states to have passed laws requiring hospitals to report rates of hospital-acquired infections.

As Pennsylvania recently released its second annual report, the American Journal of Medical Quality published three studies, providing new evidence that hospitals could prevent many of the growing number of infections if they practiced better hygiene.

The studies independently concluded that, despite hospitals' claims, it's not true that infections are inevitable in the sickest patients. Researchers found that infections acquired in the hospital arise mainly from poor hygiene during hospital procedures, not from how sick patients were when they were admitted.

"Hospital-acquired infections should not be viewed as inevitable," said Marc Volavka, executive of the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council. "The simple fact is that every patient that enters the hospital in Pennsylvania and in this country is at risk for a hospital-acquired infection."

For years, Volavka said, epidemiologists have debated what qualifies as a hospital-acquired infection and argued that statistics aren't good enough to report to the public.

But Volavka and the Pennsylvania council, which he has led since 1988, kept pushing.

The definition of a hospital-acquired infection is simple, he said: "You didn't come into the hospital with it, and you got it in the hospital."

Data may not be complete, but it will never be complete until you start collecting it and making it public, he said.

For example, in 2005, when Pennsylvania's 2004 infection data were published, 11,668 patients reportedly got hospital-acquired infections. In 2006, the number jumped to 19,154.

"That wasn't because Pennsylvania hospitals had more infections," he said. It was because "more hospitals complied with the law."

The council still doesn't believe it's getting complete data, but it's getting better. "We made, I think, an important judgment not to let the perfect be the enemy of the good," he said. "The data will never be perfect."

Will the Carolinas follow?

This year, the S.C. legislature passed a reporting requirement that takes effect in 2008. The first report will be issued in February 2009.

A similar bill, facing opposition from the N.C. Hospital Association, died in the N.C. legislature in 2005. But Rob Thompson of N.C. Public Interest Research Group will try again in 2007.

Meanwhile, many hospitals responded to infection concerns by installing dispensers of hand cleanser in patient rooms. Doctors and nurses at Carolinas Medical Center are instructed to "foam in and foam out" as they enter and leave. The same is true at Presbyterian Hospital, which employs a nurse to monitor the staff's hygiene habits.

If you're a patient, or visiting a patient, do your part. Don't be shy about asking: "Did you wash your hands?"

SEARCH THIS SITE